JANUARY, 2000 URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY MINUTES:

JANUARY 11, 2000

1.    CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL:  Chair Moore called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.  Chair Moore and Members Church, Peterson, Lehmann, MacGregor, and Welch answered the roll.  Member Searcey was absent.  A quorum was present.
2.    CITIZEN'S COMMENTS AND CONCERNS:  None.
3.    COMMITTEE COMMENTS AND CONCERNS:  Member Peterson expressed a concern regarding whether the parking lot of City Hall could be included in the Urban Renewal area, as the City Hall was part of it, but the parking lot was not. Discussion ensued regarding the process of adding property to the Urban Renewal area, and the percentage of total area which could be included.  Consensus of the Committee was not to pursue any revision to the boundaries at this time.  Member MacGregor read the recommendations for parking improvements in the Urban Renewal Plan, and cited the reasons for forming the district to begin with, expressing a concern that the infrastructure improvements are going to take all of the monies.  He also expressed a concern that citizen participation in the process was curtailed by the fact that the City Council was the Urban Renewal Board. 
4.     MINUTES:  Member Welch moved to approve the minutes from the Nov. 16, 1999 meeting as presented, Member Peterson seconded, and the motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
5.    BILLS:  Member Lehmann moved to approve the engineer's bills as presented, Member Welch seconded, and the motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.  Member Lehmann moved to approve the City of Waldport's invoices, Member Welch seconded.  Member Welch asked if the hours had been submitted for the televising of the lines.  Mr. McClintock indicated that the project has not yet been completed.  The motion to approve the invoices then carried unanimously on a voice vote.
6.    FINANCIAL REPORT & CASH BALANCES:  Chair Moore noted that the cash balance as of the end of December was $1,151,587.00, although there were still some outstanding invoices.  A brief discussion ensued regarding the amount of monies still available for projects.
7.    STORM WATER MASTER PLAN:  Chair Moore noted that copies of the plan had been submitted to the members for their review.  It was noted that if all recommendations were implemented, the cost of the plan would be 1.9M.  Member Welch suggested that a starting point might be to clean out the existing system.  Mr. McClintock indicated that the Public Works crew could be utilized to perform that work, as it is normally a maintenance issue.  Discussion ensued regarding the current condition of the storm water system, the extent of participation by the City and the Urban Renewal Agency, and which portions of the plan could be implemented for the least amount of money.  Member Lehmann moved to adopt the Storm Water Master Plan, Member Welch seconded, and following a brief discussion, the motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.  Consensus of the Agency was to have Mr. McClintock look at the areas of immediate need and incorporate the projected figures into the budget process.
8.    STORM WATER LID:  Member MacGregor moved to reject the proposal.  Member Peterson seconded.  Member MacGregor clarified that the motion was to not recommend the adoption of the plan to the Council.  Discussion ensued.  Mr. MacGregor noted that he had a conflict of interest in the fact that he had property inside the area, and asked for a determination from the Agency regarding whether he could participate.  Member Welch moved to allow Mr. MacGregor to participate in the discussion and the voting.  Member Peterson seconded, and the motion carried, with Members Church, Peterson, Moore and Welch voting "Aye", Member Lehmann voting "Nay".  The motion to not present the proposal to the Council then carried unanimously on a voice vote.
9.    NEW PROJECTS, PLANNING FOR YEAR 2000:  Discussion ensued regarding the projects for future calendar years.  Mr. McClintock noted that the Cedar Street overlay will be addressed with Road District #3 funds, so the Agency eliminated it from the projects.  Chair Moore suggested that W-8 be eliminated, since the Port had completed their improvements in that area, and the project would require the tearing up of the area.  New-1:  Mr. Stonecypher noted that this project should be completed with cooperation and monies from ODOT, and Red Ditch was now capable of handling the runoff.  SD- 3:  Mr. Stonecypher noted that this project was not a high priority, as the Norwood diversion should be completed first.  Member Lehmann moved to complete the Norwood drainage project, culvert and fill South Red Ditch, and put in sidewalks along Starr St.  Member Welch seconded.  Discussion ensued.  Member Lehmann amended her motion to add that ODOT had to do the outfall.  The amendment was not seconded.  Following further discussion, the main motion failed unanimously on a voice vote.  W-4:  Spring St. Sidewalks:  Mr. McClintock noted that some water and sewer improvements would need to be accomplished prior to putting in the sidewalks.  Culvert and Fill North Red Ditch:  Member Lehmann moved to culvert and pave north Red Ditch and put in the parking and sidewalk, in connection with Tri-Agg, ODOT, and the School District and the City.  Member Welch seconded, and the motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.  In regards to sidewalk improvements, Member MacGregor noted that he had been under the impression that the above-ground improvements would be addressed in the present year, but it appeared that there were a lot more underground improvements which needed to be addressed first.  Discussion ensued.  Member Welch moved to construct a sidewalk, including curbs and gutters, from Verbina to John Street for a cost not to exceed $5,000, Member Lehmann seconded.  Following a brief discussion, the motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
10.    BUDGET:  Member Lehmann moved to continue the contract with the City for $1,000 plus the cost of living.  Member Welch seconded, and the motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
11.    ENGINEER'S CONTRACT:  Member Lehmann moved to continue the Urban Renewal Engineer's contract with Dyer Partnership for another year at the same terms.  Member Welch seconded, and the motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
12.    ADJOURNMENT:  At 7:40 p.m., there being no further  business to come before the Agency, Member Peterson moved to adjourn, Member Church seconded, and the motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.

Respectfully submitted,
Reda A. Quinlan
City Clerk

APPROVED by the Agency this 8th day of February, 2000.
SIGNED by the Chair this 8th day of February, 2000.

Gene Moore, Chair

Back To URA Minutes

Home