SOUTH
WALDPORT SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
CITY
OF WALDPORT
LINCOLN
COUNTY, OREGON
PROJECT
NO. 8505.11
JULY,
2002
(REVISED
JANUARY, 2003)
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
1.
Introduction
2.
Purpose and Need of Project
Deficiencies
of Ocean Hills Pump Station and Force Main System
Hydraulic
Capacity of the Sewer Conveyance System
3.
Project Alternatives
Summary
4.
Proposed South Waldport Project
Ocean
Hills Pump Station & Force Main
Crestline
Drive 15-Inch Sewer Main
Crestline
Bypass Sewer Improvements
5.
Environmental Issues
6.
Easements
7.
Project Cost Summary
8.
Financing
Revenue
Bonds
Local
Improvement District (Improvement Bonds)
Financing
Plan A
Financing
Plan B
Financing
Plan C
Summary
of Financing Plans
9.
References
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 - Grade School Pump Station Capacity and Projected
Design Flows
Table 2 - Summary of Proposed Mitigation Measures and
Implementation
Table 3 - Project Cost Summary
Table 4 -Sewer User Costs with Financing Plan A
Table 5 -Proposed Local Financing for Financing Plan B
Table 6 -Sewer Costs for Revenue Bonds for Financing Plan B
Table 7 -LID Assessment Distribution – Financing Plan B
Table 8- LID Assessment Distribution-Financing Plan C
APPENDIX
Table
A-1-Preliminary Cost Estimates
Figure A – Proposed Improvements *Note:
Not available in on-line version
Figure B – Crestline Bypass to WWPT *Note:
Not available in on-line version
Figure C – LID Map *Note:
Not available in on-line version
SOUTH WALDPORT SEWER LID – LEGAL
DESCRIPTION W/ MAP *Note: Map
not available in on-line version
ENGINEERING
REPORT
SOUTH
WALDPORT SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
The purpose of this Engineering Report is to define the
proposed South Waldport Sewer Improvements including purpose and need of
project, scope, cost estimates, environmental issues related to the project and
proposed financing of the improvements.
This Engineering Report is also intended to provide the documentation requirements contained in the City’s Municipal Code, Chapter 3.08.020 that is needed for the formation of a local improvement district (LID). A summary of these documentation requirements is given below.
*
A full description of the project.
* A description of each parcel of land specially benefited.
* The record owner of each parcel.
* The name and last address of the person currently assessed
for each parcel as shown by the records of the Lincoln County assessor.
* An estimate of the probable cost of the project, including
legal, administrative and engineering costs attributable to such project.
* A recommendation of a fair apportionment of the whole or any
portion of the costs of the project to the property specifically benefited.
* A recommendation of a method of assessment, together with an
estimate of the cost per unit to the property specifically benefited.
* All easements necessary and estimates of the cost of
obtaining the same (Ord. 370 § 2,1977)
2.
Purpose and Need of Project
The proposed South Waldport Sewer Improvements are intended
to correct existing deficiencies with the Ocean Hills Pump Station and
associated force main, eliminate hydraulic overload of the Red River sewer main,
reduce the hydraulic load to the City’s Grade School Pump Station, and
eliminate the operation of the Township 13 Pump Station.
The
net effect of the proposed improvements is to eliminate several of the existing
deficiencies currently identified within the City’s existing wastewater
collection system, removes a conveyance limitation at the Grade School Pump
Station, and provides opportunity for conveying additional sewage to the
City’s wastewater treatment plant.
In addition to the above improvements,
installation of a reclaimed water pipe for future conveyance of the treated
effluent from the City’s wastewater treatment plant to the Crestview Hills
Golf Course may be installed with the proposed sewer improvements. The purpose
of the reclaimed water pipe installation is for future conveyance of treated
effluent to the Crestview Hills Golf Course for turf irrigation.
The purpose of installing this pipe, as part of the South Waldport Sewer
Improvements, is to take advantage of simultaneous installation of utilities
within easement areas and existing right-of-ways.
Since the City or its customers will not finance the reclaimed water use
pipe, the installation and financing of this improvement will not be discussed
further in this report.
A summary of the existing deficiencies within the City’s
sewers, as related to the proposed improvements, is discussed below.
Alternatives to the proposed improvements are discussed below under
Project Alternatives. Additional information on the proposed project may be
found in the following documents authored by The Dyer Partnership: City of
Waldport Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (2000), Addendum No.
1 to the City of Waldport Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (2002),
the Environmental Report, South Waldport Sewer Improvements (2001), and
the Preliminary Engineering Report – Crestline Drive Bypass to Wastewater
Treatment Facility (1998).
Deficiencies of Ocean Hills Pump Station and Force Main
System
The Ocean Hills Pump Station and force
main were constructed in the early 1990s without DEQ approval or review and did
not comply with the department’s guidelines.
Since construction of the system, DEQ staff has reviewed the design and
outlined various tests and modifications necessary for system acceptance (Mann
1995). DEQ’s most critical
concerns included the following.
The pump station did not meet
Reliability Level 1 Criteria and DEQ’s wet well design guidelines, and lacked
sulfide control measures, telemetry, wash water service, and standby power
capability.
The downstream gravity sewer system
(i.e. Red River basin) cannot accommodate peak sewage flows from the pump
station without surcharging manholes.
Based on their
review, DEQ recommended installation of a new pump station and wet well, and a
new 4-inch diameter pipe into the existing 6-inch diameter force main
that is anchored in place with grout slurry.
To date, only the telemetry and water connection improvements have been
installed in the pump station.
From Ocean Hills Subdivision to Range
Drive, the existing water mains and sewer force main are in such close proximity
it is doubtful that the Health Division’s separation requirements (Oregon
Administrative Rule, OAR 333-061-0050 (10)) for these two utilities are
satisfied. During previous
subsurface explorations of the water and sewer mains near Seabrook Lane (The
Dyer Partnership 1996), the sewer line was observed to be above the water
main, which is not in compliance with the separation requirements.
PacWest (1998a) also noted that there was insufficient horizontal
separation between the existing sewer force main and water main.
The proposed project is needed to
correct the above deficiencies within the existing pump station, force main, and
hydraulic overload created by its discharge into the Red River sewer collection
system.
Hydraulic Capacity of The Sewer Conveyance System
One objective of the South Waldport
Sewer Improvements is to maintain and upgrade the hydraulic capacity of the
City’s sewer conveyance system. One
limitation of the existing conveyance system is the capacity of the Grade School
Pump Station., which is located next to City Hall.
This station currently receives all sewage generated within the
collection system and conveys the incoming flow to the City’s wastewater
treatment plant via 3,200 feet of 10-inch force main.
Discharge capacity of this station with all three pumps in operation is
approximately 2.05 MGD. Based on projected growth within the City, the station
hydraulic capacity will be insufficient to handle the projected peak flows. The
lack of available capacity within the Grade School Pump Station restricts the
potential expansion of sewer service within the City limits, including developed
areas in the north and east sections of town.
The proposed South Waldport Sewer
Improvements would reduce the amount of sewage entering the Grade School Pump
Station by creating a regional system to convey sewage generated from the South
Waldport area directly to the wastewater treatment plant.
Specifically, the Ocean Hills Pump Station and Crestline Bypass
improvements would convey sewage directly to the City’s wastewater treatment
plant. These improvements would
also lay the groundwork for conveying sewage flow from other areas in South
Waldport directly to the treatment plant, which would further reduce the
hydraulic loading to the Grade School Pump Station.
The potential areas that may be served by the proposed improvements
includes the basins currently served by the Forest Service and the Waziyata Pump
Stations, and future service to UGB No. 3.
A comparison of the Grade School Pump
Station discharge capacity with the projected design flows with the proposed
South Waldport Sewer Improvements is provided in Table 1.
GRADE
SCHOOL PUMP STATION CAPACITY AND PROJECTED DESIGN FLOWS(1)
|
|
Flow
(MGD) |
||
|
Description |
2000 |
2020 |
Ultimate Build-Out |
|
Grade School Pump Station |
|
|
|
|
Capacity w/ 2 Pumps |
1.77 |
- |
- |
|
Capacity w/ 3 Pumps |
2.05 |
- |
- |
|
Design Flows – City Limits |
|
|
|
|
Without I/I Reduction |
2.6 |
3.50 |
5.05 |
|
With I/I Reduction |
- |
3.00 |
4.55 |
|
Design
Flows – City Limits w/ Proposed Improvements |
|||
|
Without I/I Reduction |
2.6 |
1.80 |
3.35 |
|
With I/I Reduction |
- |
1.36 |
2.85 |
Conveyance of the sewage originating
from South Waldport to the wastewater treatment plant would provide conveyance
capacity for future sewer service within the City and some of the proposed new
UGB areas in the Year 2020 without increasing the capacity to the Grade School
Pump Station and associated force main. For
ultimate build-out, the Grade School Pump Station and its force main will need
to be modified with or without the proposed improvements.
A number of engineering studies have addressed potential
solutions for Ocean Hills Pump Station and force main, and the proposed
Crestline Bypass. These studies
include those by The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners, Inc. (1998, 2000),
Hasan (1996), PacWest Engineering (1998a,b), and Westech Engineering (1997).
The following is a discussion of the findings from these studies.
Hasan (1996) proposed, in accordance with DEQ preferences, to
1) remove the existing Ocean Hills Pump Station, 2) install a new pump station
that will meet DEQ standards, 3) install a new 4-inch diameter force main.
PacWest Engineering (May 1998) made a similar proposal except that a new
4-inch diameter main would be installed instead of sliplining the existing
6-inch diameter sewer main. In
addition, the proper horizontal and vertical separation required between sewer
and water mains would be established as prescribed by the Oregon Health
Division. Total estimated cost for
the proposed improvements outlined by PacWest Engineering was $422,240 (1998a).
While these proposed improvements provided a solution to correct the
deficiencies of this pump station system, they do not allow for further
development within the Ocean Hills Subdivision or South Waldport.
Westech (1997) compiled in a sewer local improvement district
report on South Waldport for the City that was partially funded by the Lincoln
County School District. Two basic
alternatives were explored: 1) single regional pump station and associated sewer
improvements, and 2) multiple pump stations and associated trunk sewers.
The first alternative consisted of constructing a regional pump station
near the Ocean Hills Subdivision and trunk lines to serve properties to the
east, and upgrading the existing gravity sewer line along Crestline Drive. With this alternative, it was proposed to use the existing
6-inch diameter force main from the Ocean Hills Pump Station to Range Drive and
construct a new main along Range Drive to Crestline Drive.
For ultimate design flows, installation of a 8-inch diameter main along
the 6-inch force main was recommended. For
the Crestline Drive improvements, two further alternatives were examined for
conveyance to the wastewater treatment plant via a 1) force main or 2) gravity
sewer. Of these two alternatives
for a Crestline Bypass, the gravity sewer was considered the more viable option.
The second alternative examined by Westech (1997) was
construction of smaller pump stations to serve each property as it developed.
With this alternative, each pump station would be constructed by the
developer and benefit only the intended property.
Once completed and in operation, the station would be turned over to the
City. Five public pump stations and
one private pump station were anticipated.
Based on a review of the two above alternatives, Westech recommended the
City construct a single regional pump station with associated improvements
(1997). However, after discussions
between the City and the School District, it was agreed that sewage from the new
elementary school located on Crestline Drive would be conveyed by a private pump
station and 4-inch diameter force main. The
alignment of this force main would be along Crestline Drive north to a manhole
located at the intersection of Crestline Drive and Salmon Street.
This 4-inch diameter force main was constructed and is now in operation.
PacWest Engineering (1998b) prepared a report on sewer
improvements within the Patterson Creek drainage basin.
As part of this report, three alternatives were considered: 1) no
improvements, 2) new Ocean Hills Pump Station and force main alignment northeast
to Crestline Drive, 3) new Ocean Hills Pump Station and force main alignment to
the north along Highway 101 to a manhole located near the Forest Service Ranger
Station. The no improvement
alternative consisted of leaving the existing system in place and wait for a
future developer to correct the pump station and force main deficiencies.
This alternative was dismissed because it prevents future development
within the Ocean Hills development and potentially property to the east, and
does not correct the current deficiencies.
A comparison of preliminary cost estimates compiled for the remaining two
alternatives demonstrated that the proposed Crestline route was more cost
effective than the Highway 101 route ($912,600 vs. $921,510).
The engineer’s recommended design for providing service to the
Patterson Creek drainage, including the Ocean Hills development, was a new Ocean
Hills Pump Station and force main to Crestline Drive (PacWest 1998b).
The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners, Inc. prepared
two reports (1998, 2000) relating to the South Waldport Sewer Improvements.
In 1998, The Dyer Partnership proposed specific tasks and recommendations
required to direct sewage flow from the Crestline Drive collection basin
directly to the City’s wastewater treatment plant (i.e. Crestline Bypass). Alternatives for introduction of sewage from Crestline Drive
to the treatment plant’s headworks were examined.
Specifically, three alternatives were explored: 1) modify the existing
treatment plant lift station, 2) install new submersible pumps at the lift
station, and 3) construct a standpipe and in-line grinder near the headworks.
Based on preliminary cost estimates, Alternative No. 2 (install new
submersible pumps) was considered the most cost-effective option for
introduction of sewage from Crestline Drive to the treatment plant.
As part of the City’s Wastewater Collection System Master
Plan (The Dyer Partnership 2000), several system improvement alternatives for
sewer service expansion in the South Waldport area were examined.
One alternative examined was the possibility of reducing amount of I/I
within the Red River collection system to enable the Ocean Hills Pump Station to
operate as originally designed and allow future expansion of the sewer service.
The quantities of I/I measured in the Red River system line are high and
the I/I flows, or physical problems causing the I/I may be the primary cause of
surcharging on this line. It is
suspected that line damage or root penetration is reducing the capacity of this
line. If 50% of this I/I could be
eliminated, the Red River trunk line should have sufficient capacity to handle
current flows generated along this line as well as the 200 gpm from the Ocean
Hills Pump Station. With increased
flows due to expansion, however, the Red River trunk line capacity will be
insufficient to handle flows from the Ocean Hills Pump Station, even after
completion of any I/I rehabilitation. Consequently,
I/I removal within the Red River system will not correct the current
deficiencies created by the Ocean Hills Pump Station system.
The Dyer Partnership (2000) also examined two regional sewer
system alternatives. Modifications to the Ocean Hills Pump Station were
considered an essential part of both alternatives.
In the first alternative (i.e. Red River Upgrade), replacement of the Red
River trunk line (from 8-inch to 18-inch diameter) and Grade School Pump Station
system was considered. The second
alternative (i.e. Crestline Bypass) included construction of a new Ocean Hills
force main, replacement of the Crestline gravity sewer, installation of the
Crestline Bypass sewer, and modifications to the Treatment Plant Lift Station.
Based on preliminary cost estimates for construction of these
alternatives, the Crestline Bypass alternative was considered the more
economical alternative for modifying the existing system to handle future sewer
expansion ($1,031,500 vs. $1,425,000). The
Dyer Partnership (2000) recommended the proposed Ocean Hills Pump Station system
modifications and Crestline Bypass.
Several different engineers and engineering firms have
investigated the sewer needs of the Ocean Hills and South Waldport area.
A number of alternatives have been identified and explored in detail.
Of the alternatives examined, the general consensus of the engineering
reports is the 1) need to correct the deficiencies of the Ocean Hills Pump
Station system, 2) selection of the Ocean Hills Pump Station site for a regional
pump station, and 3) construction of the Crestline Bypass system.
4.
Proposed South Waldport Project
The proposed Project itself consists of four main elements:
1) modifications to the existing Ocean Hills Pump Station and installation of a
new 8-inch diameter raw sewage force main, 2) installation of a 15-inch gravity
sewer line on Crestline Drive, 3) installation of the Crestline Bypass
Improvements and 4) installation of a 4-inch diameter reclaimed water force main
to the Crestview Hills Golf Course. A
map of the proposed improvements is presented in Figures A and B (see attached).
Additional maps and photographs of selected areas of the proposed project
are presented in the Environmental Report, South Waldport Sewer Improvements
(Ibid 2001).
Ocean
Hills Pump Station & Force Main
The proposed improvements to the
existing Ocean Hills Pump Station include reducing the wet well size and
installing the following equipment: higher capacity pumps, a telemetry system, a
force main air injection system, and a
standby-generator. The existing vacuum-primed duplex pumps would be replaced
with a triplex submersible pump system adjacent to the existing dry well.
The hydraulic capacity of the pump station will be sized to handle a peak
instantaneous flow (PIF) of 480 gpm, which is the projected 20-year PIF for
South Waldport excluding the proposed Urban Growth Boundary No. 3.
The existing wet well will be modified to reduce its size and adjust its
geometry or a new wet well will be constructed. The best course for the pump
station’s wet well will be investigated during design.
The pump station controls and auxiliary equipment (telemetry, air
injection system, and standby generator) will be housed in a small building
adjacent to the existing station.
A new 8-inch diameter force main (approximately 6,500 lineal
feet) would be installed from the Ocean Hills Pump Station, located east of
Highway 101 on Parmelee Drive, to Range Drive, then to Crestline Drive to the
Salmon Street intersection. The
force main would terminate at the southern most manhole that begins the 15-inch
diameter gravity sewer main on Crestline Drive (see below).
The proposed force main would be installed using open cut, or open
trench, methods. Well-graded,
imported aggregate would be used for backfilling of trenches underneath asphalt
concrete (AC) pavement. A 1½-inch overlay of the AC pavement will be performed on
Range Drive and Crestline Drive. For unpaved surfaces (e.g. dirt roads, paths,
etc.), native material removed from the trench would be used to backfill over
the pipe trench.
From the Ocean Hills Subdivision to Range Drive, the
alignment of the new force main will follow the existing force main route, which
is along a 10 to 20 feet wide utilities right-of-way consisting of a dirt lane.
Existing utilities along this route include the existing 6-inch diameter
sewer force main, television cable line, the City’s 8-inch diameter water main
(from Ocean Hills to approximately Seabrook Lane), and Southwest Lincoln Water
District’s 8-inch diameter water main (from Seabrook Lane to Range Drive).
From Range Drive to Crestline Drive, the new force main would be constructed
within the existing AC roadway because the City’s water main is on the north
side of the street and Southwest Lincoln Water District’s water main is on the
south side of the street. The
anticipated alignment of the force main on Crestline Drive from Range Drive to
Salmon Street is in the existing AC roadway or on the west shoulder of the road.
Actual location will depend on the amount and type of conflicts with
existing utilities (i.e. water, sewer, power, telephone, etc).
Crestline
Drive 15-Inch Sewer Main
To handle the sewage collected from South Waldport, a new
15-inch diameter gravity sewer main will be installed on Crestline Drive from
Salmon Street to near the Cedar Street intersection. The gravity sewer alignment along Crestline Drive would be
within the asphalt roadway due to the lack of available space on the roadway
shoulders and conflicts with existing utilities.
Installation of the new 15-inch diameter sewer main would include
replacement of approximately 100 existing service connections and portions of
the associated sewer laterals. Open
trench construction for the installation of the sewer mains is proposed for
these improvements. A 1½ -inch
overlay of the AC pavement is also recommended for placement on the impacted
sections of Crestline Drive.
Crestline
Bypass Sewer Improvements
The proposed Crestline Bypass Sewer Improvements include
installation of a new 15-inch diameter gravity sewer from Crestline Drive to
near the Township 13 Pump Station and thence to the City’s Wastewater
Treatment Plant, and a 8-inch diameter sewer main from the Township 13 Pump
Station to the new 15-inch gravity line. In
addition, the proposed improvements include decommissioning of the Township 13
Pump Station, and modifications to the Treatment Plant Lift Station.
From Crestline Drive to the Township 13 Pump Station, the
gravity sewer would be installed in an infrequently used dirt road (10 to 15
feet wide). The proposed gravity sewer lines would be installed using open
trench methods. Well-graded,
imported aggregate would be used for backfilling of trenches underneath AC
pavement. For unpaved surfaces
(e.g. dirt roads, paths, etc.), native material removed from the trench would be
used to backfill the pipe trench.
The sewer main alignment for the 8-inch and 15-inch diameter
mains from the Township 13 Pump Station to the City’s existing
wastewater treatment plant would be within a combination of existing and newly
constructed dirt paths/roads. An
easement would be required for the sewer alignment in this area.
From Township 13 Pump Station, an 8-inch diameter gravity main would be
placed in an existing dirt lane and connect to the 15-inch diameter gravity line
from Crestline Drive at a new manhole. From
this point to the City’s treatment plant, the new 15-inch diameter gravity
line would be installed cross-country over a previously logged area that
includes two upland drainage ways. Installation of a culvert and road fill is
proposed for both upland drainage way crossings.
The Treatment Plant Lift Station, located at the City’s
wastewater treatment plant site, would be modified to increase hydraulic
capacity with the addition of new non-clog submersible pumps.
These pumps would be sized to handle the projected flow originating from
the Ocean Hills Pump Station and the Crestline Drive collection basin.
Environmental issues related to the design, construction and
operation of the proposed project were investigated and discussed in Environmental
Report, South Waldport Sewer Improvements (2001), Addendum No. 1 to this
report (2001), and Addendum No. 1 to the City of Waldport Collection System
Master Plan (2002). The
proposed mitigation measure, implementation criteria, and measure enforcement
are summarized in Table 2.
The proposed South Waldport Sewer Improvements are consistent
with the 20-year growth projections within the present UGB and the City’s
long-range plan. The proposed
improvements identified and discussed in this Addendum are consistent with the Environmental
Report, South Waldport Sewer Improvements (April 2001).
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED MITIGATION
MEASURES AND IMPLEMENTATION
|
Proposed Measure |
Implementation Criteria |
Measure Enforcement |
|
Acquire building, plumbing &
electrical permits from Lincoln County for work at the City’s wastewater
treatment plant. |
Decision the acquisition of required
permits would be made during project design. |
The City or its contractor would
acquire the necessary permits. Permit
conditions, if any, would be incorporated into construction contract
documents. The contractor
would be required to comply with the provisions of the contract documents. |
|
Acquire Lincoln County conditional
use permit for Crestline Bypass sewer line installation |
Permit would be required for
construction. |
Permit conditions, if any, would be
incorporated into construction contract documents. The contractor would be required to comply with the
provisions of the contract documents. |
|
Install riprap of upstream and
downstream sides on the utilities right-of-way crossing over Middle Branch
of Patterson Creek. |
Placement of riprap would be needed
to protect new force main installation. |
Riprap placement would be
incorporated into the construction contract documents.
The contractor would be required to comply with the provisions of
the contract documents. |
|
Place imported aggregate or seed
& mulch the utilities right-of-way crossing over Middle Branch of
Patterson Creek |
Selection of specific erosion control
measure would be after further review of project site and discussion with
City staff. |
Selected measure would be
incorporated into project design & construction contract documents.
The contractor would be required to comply with the provisions of
the contract documents. |
|
Use of erosion & sediment
controls to minimize impact to wetlands, biological resources, &
surface waterways |
Selection of specific erosion control
measures would be depend on the site (e.g. slope, soil type, proximity to
waterway), & proposed construction (e.g. open trench, trenchless). |
Appropriate erosion control measures
will be specified in the construction contract documents.
The contractor would be required to comply with the provisions of
the contract documents. |
|
Investigation of alternative routes
for sewer line alignment within or adjacent to riparian zones (i.e.
utilities right-of-way near Ocean Hills Subdivision & Crestline
Bypass). |
During design, routes for proposed
sewer lines would be evaluated with respect to cost, available grade, area
of impact, access, & potential impact to biological resources. |
Review of alternative sewer line
routes discussed in this report would be part of the design requirements
for this project. Findings from investigation would be sent to Rural
Development staff for review & approval. |
|
Removal & disposal of A-C pipe
would be in compliance with OR-OSHA, OAR 437, Division 3 Construction
& DEQ Asbestos Control Program. |
Work with A-C pipe is anticipated. |
Appropriate requirements for A-C pipe
removal & disposal would be incorporated into the construction
contract documents. The
contractor would be required to comply with the provisions of the contract
documents. |
|
Incorporate traffic control,
construction signing, and roadway repair measures into project. |
Specific measures needed for the
project would be evaluated & selected during the design phase. |
Appropriate measures would be
incorporated into construction contract documents. The contractor would be required to comply with the
provisions of the contract documents. |
Several easements will be required for construction of the
proposed improvements. From the
Ocean Hills Pump Station to Range Drive, it is anticipated that six temporary
construction easements, and possibly six permanent easements, will be required
for the new improvements. Although
there are existing wastewater infrastructure within the project area (i.e.
existing pump station and force main), permanent easements may be required
depending upon the language of the existing easements and final routing
location.
No easements will be required on Range Drive and Crestline
Drive as the proposed force main and gravity sewer would be within the public
right-of-way.
From Crestline Drive to the City’s wastewater treatment
plant, acquisition of six permanent and construction easements is anticipated.
There is an existing force main with an alignment between Township 13
Pump Station and Crestline Drive. If
the existing easement for this sewer line allows for the installation of the
proposed 15-inch diameter gravity main then only five permanent easements would
be required.
The anticipated cost for acquiring the necessary easements is
estimated to range from $5,000 to $10,000.
The cost for legal review of the easements is included within the Project
costs. Any compensation to private
property owners would from the Project’s contingencies.
The actual number of easements and cost for acquisition would be
determined prior to construction.
The cost estimates presented in this
Addendum include four components: 1) construction, 2) contingency, 3)
engineering, and 4) legal, administration, and financing.
Construction cost estimates are based on estimated quantities and
construction costs from similar projects. The
contingency for the proposed improvements was estimated to be from 11 to 15
percent. Engineering costs were
estimated to be from 17 to 20 percent depending upon the complexity of the
improvement. Legal, administrative,
and financing costs were estimated to be from 7.4 to 7.7 percent of the
construction cost. The
legal, administration and financing cost components in this report are related
to the planning, design and construction of the proposed improvements.
This cost component does not include the associated cost for long-term
administration of the financing mechanism utilized for the project (e.g. 20-year
financing for a local improvement district, LID).
In addition to the above four cost components, a cost for right-of-way
acquisition was added for the Crestline Bypass Improvements as much of the
proposed sewer main alignment is within private property.
A summary of the estimated project costs for the recommended
improvements are given in Table 3. A
copy of more detailed cost estimates is attached as Table A-1 (see Appendix).
TABLE 3
PROJECT COST SUMMARY
|
Item |
Cost, $ |
|
Ocean Hills Pump Station & Force Main to Range Dr. |
659,000 |
|
New Force Main Along Range Dr. & Crestline Dr. |
378,000 |
|
New Crestline Drive Sewer Main |
481,000 |
|
Crestline Bypass Sewer Improvements |
626,000 |
|
Total |
2,144,000 |
Rural Development has obligated a combination of loan and
grant funds to the City for financing the South Waldport Sewer Improvements.
This finance package is for $2,144,000 consisting of $1,274,000 in a loan
at 4.75 percent interest and $870,000 in grant.
Three financing mechanisms or plans have been proposed for
local financing of the South Waldport Sewer Improvements.
For ease of identification, these three programs have been designated as
Plans “A”, “B”, and “C”.
Plan A utilizes revenue bonds payable from the City’s sewer user fees
for financing all of the proposed improvements.
Plan B incorporates a combination of revenue bonds and a Local
Improvement District (LID) to finance the improvements.
In Plan C, the proposed improvements are financed solely with a LID.
A brief overview of revenue bonds and local improvement districts is
given below followed by a discussion on the proposed financing plans.
Revenue bonds are
payable solely from charges made for the services provided.
These bonds cannot be paid from tax levies or special assessments; their
only security is the borrower's promise to operate the system in a way that will
provide sufficient net revenue to meet the debt service and other obligations of
the bond issue.
Many communities prefer revenue
bonding, as opposed to general obligation bonding, because its insures that no
tax will be levied. In addition,
debt obligation will be limited to system users since repayment is derived from
user fees. Another advantage of
revenue bonds is that they do not count against a municipality's direct debt,
but instead are considered "overlapping debt.” This feature can be a
crucial advantage for a municipality near its debt limit or for the rating
agencies, which consider very closely the amount of direct debt when assigning
credit ratings. Revenue bonds also may be used in financing projects extending
beyond normal municipal boundaries. These
bonds may be supported by a pledge of revenues received in any legitimate and
ongoing area of operation, within or without the geographical boundaries of the
issuer.
Successful
issuance of revenue bonds depends on the bond market evaluation of the revenue
pledged. Revenue bonds are most
commonly retired with revenue from user fees.
Recent legislation has eliminated the requirement that the revenues
pledged to bond payment have a direct relationship to the services financed by
revenue bonds. Revenue bonds may be paid with all or any portion of revenues
derived by a public body or any other legally available monies. In addition, if additional security to finance revenue bonds
was needed, a public body may mortgage grant security and interests in
facilities, projects, utilities or systems owned or operated by a public body.
Normally, there are no legal
limitations on the amount of revenue bonds to be issued, but excessive issue
amounts are generally unattractive to bond buyers because they represent high
investment risks. In rating revenue
bonds, buyers consider the economic justification for the project, reputation of
the borrower, methods and effectiveness for billing and collecting, rate
structures, provision for rate increases as needed to meet debt service
requirements, and track record in obtaining rate increases historically.
In addition, other factors considered include adequacy of reserve funds
provided in the bond documents, supporting covenants to protect projected
revenues, and the degree to which forecasts of net revenues are considered sound
and economical.
Municipalities may elect to issue
revenue bonds for revenue producing facilities without a vote of the electorate
(ORS 288.805-288.945). In this
case, certain notice and posting requirements must be met and a 60-day waiting
period is mandatory. A petition
signed by five percent of the municipality's registered voters may cause the
issue to be referred to an election.
Local
Improvement District (Improvement Bonds)
Improvement bonds issued for local improvement districts (LIDs)
are used to administer special assessments for financing local improvements in
cities, counties, and some special districts.
Common improvements financed through a LID include storm and sanitary
sewers, street paving, curbs, sidewalls, water mains, recreational facilities,
street lighting, and off-street parking. The
basic principle of special assessment is that it is a charge imposed upon
property owners who receive special benefits from an improvement beyond the
general benefits received by all citizens in the community.
A public agency should consider three “principles of benefit” when
deciding to use special assessment: 1) direct service, 2) obligation to others,
and 3) equal sharing/basis. Cities
are limited to improvement bonds not exceeding three percent of true cash value.
The Oregon
Legislature has provided cities with a procedure for special assessment
financing (ORS 223.387-399), which applies when city charter or ordinance
provisions do not specify otherwise. To establish a LID, an improvement district
is formed, the boundaries are established, and the benefited properties and
property owners are determined. An approximate assessment to each property is
determined based on the above three principles of benefit and is documented in a
written report. Property owners are
then given an opportunity to object to the project assessments.
The assessments against the properties are usually not levied until the
actual cost of the project is determined. Since
this determination is normally not possible until the project is completed,
funds are not available from assessments for the purpose of making monthly
payments to the contractor. Therefore, some method of interim financing must be
arranged based on the estimated total costs.
The primary disadvantage to this source
of revenue is that the property to be assessed must have a true cash value at
least equal to 50 percent of the total assessments to be levied.
As a result, owners of undeveloped property usually require a substantial
cash payment. In addition, the
development of an assessment district is very cumbersome and expensive.
Two maps of the proposed LID are
provided in this report. A overview
map (8½ “ X 11”) of the proposed LID is presented in Figure C.
A larger map (24” X 48”) of the LID, with individual tax lots, is
also included in a separate folder at the end of the report (Figure D).
In addition, a copy of a legal description is provided at the end of the
report.
With Financing Plan A, local financing of the proposed
improvements would be accomplished through revenue bonds.
Total project cost for the proposed improvements is estimated to be
$2,144,000. The amount of loan and
grant is $1,274,000 and $870,000, respectively.
The debt service resulting from a loan of $1,274,000 at 4.75 percent
interest for 40 years is as follows. The
projected monthly debt service was calculated based on an equivalent residential
unit (ERU) and average unit of water-consumed basis.
The average monthly water consumed by an ERU was calculated to be 3,837
gallons per month or 5.12 units per month where one unit equals 750 gallons
(City of Waldport 2001).
New Annual Debt Service
= Loan Amount X Capital Recovery Factor
=
$1,274,000 x 0.05630
=
$71,726.20 per year
No. of Wastewater ERUs in the City = 1,171
New Monthly Debt Service Per ERU =
Annual Debt Service/ (ERUs) X (12 months/year)
=
$71,726.20 / (1,171 ERUs X 12 months/year)
=
$5.10 per ERU-month.
New Debt Service Per Average
Unit Water Consumed
= Monthly Debt Service Per ERU/Ave.Units Consumed
=
$5.10 per ERU-month / 5.12 units/ERU-month)
=
$1.00 per unit of water consumed.
A summary of the annual and monthly sewer user costs with the
proposed revenue bond is presented in Table 4. These costs include operation and maintenance, new debt
service, and debt reserve that will be required by Rural Development.
TABLE 4
SEWER USER COSTS WITH FINANCING PLAN A
|
Item |
Annual Cost, $ |
Monthly Cost, $ |
|
Debt Service on $1,274,000 loan |
71,726 |
5.10 |
|
Debt Reserve |
7,173 |
0.51 |
|
Operation and Maintenance |
383,192 |
27.26 |
|
Total Cost |
462,091 |
32.87 |
(1) – Based on 1,171 ERUs or 5.12 units of water per month.
As mentioned above, proposed Financing Plan B uses of a
combination of a revenue bonds and a LID to finance the South Waldport Sewer
Improvements. The rationale for
Plan B is summarized below.
Revenue
Bonds. This financing
mechanism would be utilized to finance the following improvements including the
1) Force Main Along Range Drive, 2) Crestline 15-Inch Diameter Sewer Main, and
the 3) Crestline Bypass Sewer Improvements.
With these improvements, sewage generated within the South Waldport area
will be conveyed directly to the City’s WWTP, which relieves capacity
limitations at the City’s Grade School Pump Station and associated force main.
All sewer users within the City will benefit from these improvements.
Local
Improvement District (LID). A LID
would be used to assess the properties in South Waldport that would directly
benefit from the increase in wastewater conveyance capacity for this area.
The proposed LID would finance the Ocean Hills Pump Station and Force
Main to Range Drive as these improvements will specifically benefit property
owners located in the southern part of the City.
The addition of new sewer service to both developed and undeveloped lots
in South Waldport is limited by the ability to convey sewage from this area to
the City’s Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP).
Construction of the proposed improvements to the Ocean Hills Pump Station
and Force Main to Range Drive will provide sufficient capacity to convey sewage
from the South Waldport area for the next 20 years.
Relative
Project Costs. Relative
project costs for the improvements to be borne by the LID and via revenue bonds
is 30.74 percent and 69.26 percent, respectively.
The proposed loan and grant amounts were calculated based on the above
relative percent costs. A breakdown
of the proposed local financing is shown in Table 5.
TABLE 5
PROPOSED LOCAL FINANCING FOR FINANCING PLAN B
|
Financing |
Project Cost, $ |
% Cost |
Loan, $ |
Grant, $ |
|
Revenue Bonds |
1,485,000 |
69.26 |
882,440 |
602,560 |
|
LID |
659,000 |
30.74 |
391,560 |
267,440 |
|
Total |
2,144,000 |
100.00 |
1,274,000 |
870,000 |
A detailed discussion of these proposed local financing
mechanisms is discussed in detail below.
Revenue
Bond Financing. With the
proposed revenue bonds, all users of the City’s sewer system would make
repayment of these bonds. Total
project cost for the revenue bond financed improvements is estimated to be
$1,485,000. The amount of loan and
grant allocated to the revenue bond financed portion of the improvements is
$882,440 and $391,560, respectively. The
debt service resulting from a loan of $882,440 at 4.75 percent interest for 40
years is as follows. The monthly
debt service was calculated in a manner similar to the procedures discussed in
Financing Plan A.
New Annual Debt Service
= Loan Amount X Capital Recovery Factor
=
$882,440 x 0.05630
=
$49,681.37 per year
No. of Wastewater ERUs in the City = 1,171
New Monthly Debt Service Per ERU =
Annual Debt Service/ (ERUs) X (12 months/year)
=
$49,681.37 / (1,171 ERUs X 12 months/year)