DECEMBER, 2005 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 1, 2005
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Mayor Beckstead called the
meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Mayor Beckstead and Councilors Kelly, Hanes,
Woodruff, Welch and Church answered the roll. Councilor Campbell was excused. A
quorum was present.
2. CITIZEN COMMENTS AND CONCERNS: None.
3. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND CONCERNS: None.
4. MINUTES: The Council considered the minutes from the November 3 Council
Workshop and Council Meeting. Councilor Woodruff moved to approve the
minutes as presented. Councilor Welch seconded, and the motion carried
unanimously on a voice vote.
5. PUBLIC HEARING: Mayor Beckstead opened the Public Hearing regarding the
modification of Water System Development Charges. No comments were received.
Mayor Beckstead then closed the public hearing.
6. STAFF REPORTS:
A. City Manager: Ms. Leonard addressed a proposed tsunami operations and
maintenance agreement with Central Oregon Coast Fire and Rescue District (COCFRD).
Councilor Welch indicated that he was supportive of the agreement, noting that
under the emergency plan the operation of the siren was the purview of COCFRD.
Councilors Kelly and Hanes expressed concern that this may affect the weekly
testing. Mayor Beckstead noted the City could certainly request that the testing
continue. Ms. Leonard stated that the language could be inserted into the
agreement, and that any deviation would need to be discussed with the City.
Councilor Welch moved to adopt the agreement as amended, Councilor Kelly
seconded. The motion carried, with Mayor Beckstead and Councilors
Kelly, Woodruff, Welch and Church voting "Aye", Councilor Hanes voting "Nay".
Ms. Leonard discussed the certified LID mailing to the residents in the South
Sewer Project area. She reviewed the project costs, noting that the funding was
a combination of grant monies, a slight increase in sewer rates, and an LID to
benefitted properties. In regard to the Downtown Revitalization project, Ms.
Leonard reported that ODOT has finalized their engineering plans and want to
present them to the Revitalization Committee in the middle of January. ODOT has
decided that they will retain ownership of the sidewalks, though the City will
maintain them, and Ms. Leonard noted she has inquired about liability but has
not yet received an answer. Councilor Church noted some business owners are
becoming concerned about parking during construction, and Ms. Leonard suggested
that this be discussed at the committee meeting. Councilor Church mentioned that
the City’s first right of refusal on the parking lot next to Clark’s Market may
be an issue on the sale of the Patterson’s property. Ms. Leonard responded that
the Urban Renewal Agency does have first right of refusal of a reasonable offer,
and an emergency meeting may be called if necessary. The final item on Ms.
Leonard’s report was to ask the Council if the meeting in January could be
scheduled for the 12th rather than the 5th. Consensus
of the Council was favorable.
B. Public Works: Mr. McClung reported that the crew was being kept busy with
keeping storm drains unplugged and flowing. The South Sewer project was still on
schedule, and should be finished by the beginning of February. He noted that the
new vactor truck is working well, and making the job easier for
the crew. In response to a query from Councilor Kelly, Mr. McClung noted that
the storm drains had been blocked on the bulbout that is scheduled to be
replaced, so the crew did some temporary work there to alleviate the stormwater
buildup. It may be a while before the bulbout project is completed, as the
contractors are currently overwhelmed with work. Councilor Welch asked about the
status of the sludge removal project at the wastewater treatment plant, and Mr.
McClung responded that he had met with Mr. Kennedy from DEQ and had reviewed
some property which would be suitable for land application, so the notification
and permitting process will be underway to have the project completed next
summer.
7. COMMITTEE REPORTS:
A. Community Issues Forum: Councilor Welch reported that the
group was looking at the growth and development of the South County area,
discussing how the governmental entities can work better together to address
growth issues. The idea was to start the process of cooperative review in areas
such as medical services, law enforcement, affordable housing, and education. He
asked if the Council was interested in engaging in this exploration and
discussion. The group will be meeting again on December 7 and he would like to
convey the wishes of the Council. Mayor Beckstead noted the Council would be
remiss as community leaders if the City didn’t participate, and the Council
agreed.
B. Finance and Administration: Ms. Leonard noted the
Committee had met to discuss the concept of hours at the skatepark, with Deputy
Dorsey and Fire Chief Stafford. Staff was
putting together a draft ordinance for the Committee to review at their meeting
in January. Councilor Church wondered if Land and Sea Development had paid the
subdivision’s park assessment fee yet, and Ms. Leonard noted the fee would be
paid in phases. She also indicated that the City has an opportunity to apply for
a grant through State Parks next year, and they were putting together a grant
that would use the assessment fee as leverage for matching funds.
8. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: The Council considered the Municipal
Court report. No action was necessary.
9. CONSENT CALENDAR: The only item on the Consent Calendar
was a resolution memorializing the Council’s decision to dissolve the Senior
Center Advisory Board. Councilor Welch moved to approve the Consent
Calendar. Councilor Hanes seconded, and the motion carried
unanimously on a voice vote. Staff noted this was Resolution No. 1079.
10. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS:
A. Consideration of Resolution Adopting Methodology and
Updating Rates for Water System Development Charges: Ms. Leonard explained that
there had been a Public Hearing on the Water SDC rates because there was a
brand-new report based on the new Water Master Plan adopted in 2002. The City
has had SDC’s in place since 2000, but annual increases had been not been
included. The costs in the plan are based on capital improvements and reflective
of the year the report is put together, so the fees should be indexed to reflect
cost of construction increases. Ms. Leonard noted that the City’s SDC rates are
still quite low in comparison to other cities. Staff will continue to annually
review the formula to determine if it is still appropriate, and any changes will
be brought back to the Council. Councilor Kelly asked about stormwater, and Ms.
Leonard responded that cities under 10,000 were not yet required to have a
master plan for stormwater. Councilor Woodruff added that the City had looked at
the issue previously, but there had been little public
Council support. Councilor Welch moved to approve Resolution
1080. Councilor Woodruff seconded. Councilor Church cited a concern
regarding looking at other cities for comparison, as demographics differ from
community to community. The motion then carried unanimously on a voice
vote.
B. Consideration of Resolution Amending Sewer System
Development Charges: Ms. Leonard explained that the rates were being increased
based on the original master plan and annual indexing. Councilor Church asked if
the new Urban Renewal Plan would help with improvements for the sewer plant. Ms.
Leonard responded that it could, and the SDC’s can be adjusted as capital
improvements are completed. Councilor Woodruff moved to approve
Resolution 1081. Councilor Welch seconded, and the motion carried,
with Mayor Beckstead and Councilors Kelly, Hanes, Woodruff, and Welch voting
"Aye", Councilor Church voting "Nay".
C. Consideration of Resolution to Update and Replace
Resolution No. 982 Regarding Water System User Charges: Ms. Leonard explained
that this resolution clarifies and corrects the language to refer to the Code
and reflect actual billing practices. Discussion ensued. Councilor Welch
moved to approve Resolution No. 1082, Councilor Church seconded, and
the motion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
D. Consideration of Ordinance Amending the Waldport Municipal
Code Regarding Building Numbering Within the City Limits: The Council had no
objections to Mayor Beckstead reading the Ordinance twice by title only. Mayor
Beckstead read the Ordinance twice by title only. Councilor Woodruff moved
to adopt Ordinance 702. Councilor Kelly seconded, and the motion
carried unanimously.
E. Acceptance of the Audit for FY 2004-2005: Following a
brief discussion, Councilor Woodruff moved to accept the audit report as
presented by the auditors and direct that a copy of the audit be filed with the
Secretary of State. Councilor Welch seconded, and the motion carried
unanimously on a voice vote.
F. Other Issues: None.
12. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Nothing further.
13. ADJOURNMENT: At 8:34 p.m., there being no further
business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully submitted (as amended),
Reda A. Quinlan, City Clerk
APPROVED by the Waldport City Council this 12th day of
January, 2006.
SIGNED by the Mayor this 12th day of January,
2006.
Scott Beckstead, Mayor